Page 1 Home Page

page2 Seminars

Page 3 All Products

page 4 Our Services

page 5 Flow Chart

Page 6 Articles

page7 Testimonials

page 8 Champions!

page 9 Glossary of terms

Evan Graham LLC/Smartwork for Retrievers

EXCELLENCE WITH EASE!

Evan Graham’s
TRAINING FEATURE ARTICLES

From published articles by Evan Graham

NEW: TITLES – What they mean, and don’t mean
1. TITLES – What they mean, and don’t mean

2. Walking Baseball Fundamentals

3. A summer at CL-2

4. After Initial Force Work

5. An American Prespective on Field Trials and Hunt Tests

6. Cause and Effect: Trouble Shooting Training Problems

7. On your mark...get set..."fetch"

8. Two-sidedness

9. Swim-by for Any Dog

10. Dr. Jeckyll or Mr. Hyde?

11. Four-way Push/Pull drill


   
Rationale for using both Single T and Double T

By Evan Graham

 

Many of today’s trainers use some version of Basics as originally conceived by the late great Rex Carr. But the versions are sometimes broadly varied, especially in regard to some essential components.

 

Specifically, with regard to the fundamental exercises used to build basic handling skills, there is some dispute over whether a trainer will use a Single T vs. a Double T, or whether they’ll use them both. The discussions often lack one important ingredient in choosing any technique; rationale. Why do we use it? Why do we not use it? Those are the substantive questions we all need to ask.

 

Why do trainers run a full scale T of any description? What do they hope to get out of it? Let’s take a look at what they are.
Single T

One of many pile-based drills, the Single T is the first step I take from the tiny confines of 3-handed Casting, CC-to-“Sit”, and Mini-T. In those drills our dogs have learned to perform the three simple casts (Back, Right Over & Left Over), and have been conditioned to sit to a single whistle blast. This is as basic as handling skills get, and the 3-handed Casting/Mini-T format is both simple and quite short in terms of distance. That was to keep control high, pressure low, and the information simple.

 

When we took those little skills to the Single T, we simply grew those basic handling skills up a bit into a full-scale land T. The Back pile is now 100 yards away, with our Over casts 25 to 30 yards off centerline. We move our dogs through skills in a sequence of steps; small, to slightly larger scale. One by one, we move into a more real world scale instead of jumping in quantum leaps that can cause dogs to be needlessly insecure about each new phase of development.

 

The distances to the bumpers in 3-handed Casting & Mini-T were measured in a matter of a few feet, whereas in full-scale T work the distances are measured in yards. Because of that we don’t just run over to our T field and start running the drill in its complete form. We start up close to the Back pile and back up in steps to establish it.

 

When we approach the cast point (or Apex), we identify the Over piles from there while standing right in front of the dog to keep it simple and low key. Again, we increase distance overall in a sequential manner, gradually extending to full scale.


Double T
What now?
 

When we arrive at the point where our dogs have been to the new Back pile many times, and have been sent, stopped, and cast to it numerous times until we’ve backed up all the way to our start point at 100 yards, we can begin to handle at the full scale of the T. We’re growing our dog’s abilities at a rate he can easily tolerate and learn from without breaking down his enjoyment of the work or confusing him.

 

Our dogs end up being able to line the 100-yard Back pile with confidence and style, stop sharply to the whistle, and take the simple Over casts from a cast point 25 yards away. We will have forced from our side and en route prior to moving on to the Double T. This is already more than many trainers get out of their T work. But it’s far from the real potential in possesses.


So, what’s a Double T?
 
It’s the same T, but with an added cast point. But we don’t just add the new cast point for more stops and cast, although that is certainly one reason for it. It presents more training opportunities, as you will hopefully soon see.

Different trainers set it up in different ways, but this is pretty traditional. The exception is that, instead of the apexes being at 40 & 80 yards, I place them at 25 & 50 yards. My reasoning for this is that it offers better control in the early going, due to the shorter distances. It also provides a longer Back Cast (50 yards) from the last apex. Further, we get the same suction issues to work with, but again we have the dog closer to us for better control with less pressure.

 

Now the question many trainers have: “What advantages are there in having a second apex and cast piles?” I’ll just start by providing a list, and then break them down for clarity.

  1. Because there are two apexes, there are twice as many logical opportunities to get whistle stops in the same session.
  2. Because we recognize that distance erodes control, we must understand that the further away the dog is, the less apt he will be to stop, or to stop sharply, as well as to cast accurately.
  3. In the normal course of running Double T we will mix and match go-stop-cast sequences, which deepen the dogs skill by extending his concentration on the tasks. He will begin to shed his myopic views of only performing efficiently at short range.
  4. Further, the new configuration of T provides twice the en route forcing opportunities, AND twice the de-flaring opportunities as a result.
  5. Because of the influence of increased distance there is one more influence produced by the second apex. Because he’s closer to the Back pile when stopped at the second apex, there is more suction toward the Back pile. That is increased if you place that apex at 80 yards. This deepens the dog’s commitment to cast Over at that point.
  6. With the apexes at 25 & 50 yards, however, there is also heightened suction created between the closer Over piles and the second set. The benefits of suction are, again, increased skill by way of creating greater commitment to take the cast given.

 

We are still talking about basic handling skills in Double T. But we are deepening them to a far greater extent than a Single T could have offered.

 

How is skill elevated at doing anything?

 

Let’s take a hypothetical jump ahead in time for this discussion. Our young dog in Basics is now a 2 year old that is well past a basically trained status, and is now in Late Transition. He is quite steady, is competent at multiple marks, is running strong cold blinds on land and water, and has become reliable at running blinds in association with marks. He is coming along nicely, but still has a long way to go before he’s fully developed. How will we cause his good Master Hunter/Qualifying-level land blinds good enough to be reliable at All-Age blinds?

 

Anyone who has trained dogs at these levels can readily tell you that the answer is that we will have to run longer blinds, with more factors. The factors will have to be more enticing and influential to challenge his control level, and to promote greater momentum when the factors in the route tend to break it down.

 

In short, he’ll get better by doing harder work. He will become more reliable by doing the same level of work many times, but he won’t gain higher level skill unless he is exposed many times to more difficult circumstances. That principle applies to every aspect of his work.

 

How does this apply to the basic skills of T work?

 

If you skipped Single T you will have jumped into a much higher level of basic handling work than is fair. Many dogs struggle when we move ahead too fast. The Single T is an easy step ahead of Mini-T, as we apply it.

 

By getting started on Single T, and then changing to Double T, we offer our dogs a host of ways to strengthen the skills we’ve been working on through elevating the level of difficulty. It’s harder to take a straight Over cast when there is suction to another nearby pile, for example.


In the example here, the dog would have been stopped at the closer apex and given a right Over. Because of the suction of the nearby (second) Over pile, it’s reasonable that he may be drawn to that one instead. This provides the trainer with an opportunity to covey the clear message that he is to take the cast as he was directed, this elevating his level of skill. This is only one of many practical examples of how a Double T offers so much more than a Single T is capable of providing.

Some trainers have never had a vision of what Double T offers. That is even true of many trainers who have done it religiously for years. Many trainers will still not be able to understand its value. For them it’s just as well that they don’t bother. If you don’t know what your goals are, you won’t know when you have reached them.


The Double T is a drill of Basics, just as it should be. These handling skills are basic, not advanced. But they can be given the firm foundation your dog not only deserves, but that will allow him to advance more easily, as well as being more readily maintained over his working career by solidifying them right now before moving on. If you are able to see the virtues of the Double T for what they are, you’re on your way to a far better Basically Trained retriever!
Walking Baseball Fundamentals

By Evan Graham

 

The term Walking Baseball (WBB) denotes flexibility, and that is the key feature of this fine little casting drill. It is a transitional drill for developing basic handling skills after a retriever has completed land-T work, as well as a maintenance drill that may be occasionally used to sharpen several aspects of handling. Among its most appealing qualities is that it’s a useful drill for all handling dogs, and one that can be done without the need of a helper.

Created by hall-of-fame trainer D.L. Walters, WBB offers total flexibility to the trainer in what casts to focus on, how far you care to condition the dog to carry them, what combinations of casts to use, plus as many opportunities to sharpen whistle responses as you care to do in a session.

Let’s take a look at how to begin using the drill. Let’s assume that no corrections will be needed – not because that’s how it goes, but to keep instruction clear regarding drill dynamics. Later we’ll look at potential corrections.

Structured Mechanics vs. Flexibility

In the standard T drills (single-T and double-T) are certain constants representing drill dynamics. There are so-called piles (groups of training dummies or bumpers) located at specific locations, and predetermined intersections at which the dog is stopped and cast from. In WBB, there are no piles, so stop and cast points are completely flexible. Using two large orange bumpers helps to assure that they will be visible to the trainer, and provide compete freedom to cast anywhere terrain and space allow. There are just a few things about WBB that should be followed consistently to assure a smooth, successful session.

Most aspects can be adjusted as needed for the individual dog, but a key to a well-run drill is having conditions in which both bumpers are visible to the trainer at all times. Be aware of the space available. Practice this drill often so you learn quickly not to box yourself into a corner! That’s probably one of the more common errors made by trainers who are new to this drill. As you master these fundamentals, you will be able to perform it in new, creative ways each time you run it.
Designing and Adapting

It’s a bit like playing chess!

Choose a point at which to enter your field and begin the drill. What you want to consider is where you will place the first bumper because that will be the first one cast to (and retrieved) when you begin. Don’t just lay the bumper down – toss it, and let your dog see you toss every one of them. Choose a spot that will allow the bumper to be visible, and make certain that you don’t start teaching in an over-complicated scheme. Toss the bumper out in the open, away from structure and out of cover. Once the first bumper is placed, you will walk your dog away from it with the following considerations:

  1. Walk the dog as far as you want the first cast to be carried.
  2. Plan for the direction of that cast (an “over,” for example).
  3. Plan to set up the next cast according to how you position your dog and where you place the second bumper.
  4. Implement your casts by backing away from your dog the distance you want him to carry his second cast – keeping in mind your plan for giving the second cast and setting up a third one. You will need to make space for all of this.

The way in which running this drill is like playing chess is that you need to plan your next move ahead of time. For example, you must consider how far you want your cast to be carried because that’s how far you will walk your dog from the first bumper you put down. If you want to stat with a 40-yard cast, walk your dog 40 yards from the first bumper before sitting him.

Second, you will also need to preplan your second cast so that you place your next bumper appropriately before walking away from the sitting dog in the right direction, and at the preplanned distance that will determine how far that cast will be. Sound complicated? Only at first. You’ll soon find that this is much simpler than it sounds.

Before moving away to cast the dog, though the second bumper is tossed to a spot that will be the next cast. That should be roughly 15-20 feet from the dog, and at least 90-degree angle of your initial cast to reduce conflict with it, as seen in the diagram. The dotted lines indicate the path walked by the trainer, while the heavy solid arrow shows cast direction.

In Diagram 1 the trainer has decided that the drill will begin with a right “over” cast at 40 yards, and the next cast will be a left ‘over” at about the same distance. Here’s how it works:

  1. As you can see, the dog is left in a spot that will allow the first cast, as planned.
  2. The trainer has placed the second bumper at a 90-degree angle from the first one (behind the dog in this example) to reduce initial conflict.
  3. The trainer has then walked the distance of his preplanned second cast (about 40 yards)
  4. The chess game continues by planning the third cast right now. This will require consideration of having enough room to place a new bumper after the first cast, as well as enough room to walk the right distance and in the correct direction to cast from.

Diagram 2 shows the drill proceeding with the second cast (a left “over”) being given to the bumper that was placed behind the dog in Diagram 1. The third bumper position is also behind the dog, also at a 90-degree angle from the current cast, and with the trainer positioned to use the field properly for succeeding casts.


It also shows a couple of important considerations in positioning and distance. The distance walked by the trainer is calculated to produce casts of 40 yards (in this example) by assuring that the right distance is determined to exist between he last bumper down and then new handler position because that is the point at which the dog will be placed for that cast. The actual distances of casts may be extended to well over 100 yards if you like. You are not bound by a set distance so much as you must adapt to your dog’s level of development, and the amount of space available for this drill. It’s a good idea to keep distances under 50 yards the first time or two that you run WBB in order to get your dog accustomed to drill dynamics without needless pressure for corrections.

The Good News

The good news about these complicated looking first steps is that once you understand these essentials, the rest gets simpler as you continue. But you always need to be aware of proximal relationships among you, your dog, the two bumpers, and the size and layout of your training field. By doing the drill several times, you will soon find this to be far simpler than it looks in the beginning.

Day by day, running WBB becomes easier and more fun for you and your dog. The essential components of handling become sharper, which allows a trainer to advance the way in which casting is presented. First, let’s look at a simple progression from the last cast shown (Diagram 3)

The diagrams show a field that is really much smaller than is optimal, but serves to demonstrate a problem commonly encountered by those new to WBB – running out of space! We’ll soon see how that may play out as we proceed. You will also see a way to use the limitless flexibility offered by this drill.

Diagram 4 shows that, following a right “over” and two lift “overs,” the trainer decides to set up a “back” cast with a left-hand rotation. That’s fine, except the timing isn’t good because that cast positions him to literally run out of room to work on (continued below next diagram)

(continued) a subsequent cast. As you can see by where the next bumper was tossed, things get crowded – the trainer will receive the dog only a few feet from the next bumper, and will have little room for any kind of constructive casting.

Note that the initial left rotation “back” cast is set up just fine – bun now what? Not to worry! Remember, this drill is as flexible as the person using it. The cast can be given as planned, and the dog may be received as usual. Diagram 5 shows that to continue the drill, the trainer should take the dog to a new position to be cast (a right rotation “back” in this case) to the remaining bumper without placing another one for a subsequent cast. They would simply be too close to each other for the dog to separate them fairly.

The trainer can decide whether or not to continue the drill from that point or end it with that cast. Of course, a larger field decreases the likelihood of this happening, but believe me, it still happens!

How About Angles?

Angle (or “Literal”) casts can also be taught and maintained in WBB because of its limitless flexibility. You would simply proceed with the drill as shown before, only you would set up different casts according to the direction you walk from the dog. The widest variety of casts imaginable can be mixed and match as your dog advances.

In Diagram 6, you should be able to see an increased difficulty in how this one was set up. The 45-degree angle-back cast has been arranged, but the second cast bumper is now in great conflict with it, making a mistake far more likely. That’s why lots of basic preparation should have been done before such a setup is attempted. What is most likely here is that the dog may begin to take the cast as given but then be drawn toward the closer bumper. Make every effort to assure low-or no-pressure corrections. For now, let’s say it went well.

After giving the previous cast, you could move you and your dog into a position to give a left 45- degree angle-back cast to the next bumper (Diagram 7). You would do this by receiving the dog as usual from the place where you stood to give the preceding cast, placing the bumper in a position for a planned (continued below next diagram)

(continued) subsequent cast, and then moving to a position with your dog as shown by the red line in the diagram. Place your dog in position to cast 45 degrees to the bumper you left near him on the prior cast, and move yourself far enough from him to give the cast, calculating how far you want your next cast to be.

Don’t’ forget to plan ahead of what you want your next cast to be, but also don’t be afraid to move either yourself or your dog into the right position prior to the cast you want to give. Remember the flexibility of the drill – there is nothing restricting you. Also don’t forget that you can even incorporate a bumper between you and dog for a “here” cast.

Corrections

As you present more advanced combinations, you must be prepared for your dog to make some mistakes, including going (continued below next diagram)

for a wrong bumper as well as slipping whistles. You can expect the same type of problems to come up during WBB as in more conventional casting work, but it’s still different because you have more control over the dynamics of your session, which will tend to isolate certain types of mistakes your dog makes. In T-work, the dynamics are set, creating preconceived notions that both teach and distract your dog – he learns to cast and line to piles he knows, but those same piles can distract him from correct responses in the early going. In WBB, you change the location on each succeeding repetition, and there is no set “back” pile to cast off of or line to.

What distractions there are, and how tempting they are, is left entirely to the trainer in WBB. How close or how far away the set-up bumper is placed can be totally determined by you, according to how you choose to progress. In addition, you also get to choose which casts to give and at what angles. Those considerations will also determine a level of distraction for your dog.

When you begin to cast your dog at angles that bring him closer past a different bumper, you’re far more likely to get whistle refusals when trying to keep the dog from retrieving the wrong one. This will offer opportunities to strengthen whistle-sit responses. The idea is to support your basic performance without resorting to mere pressure to get it done.

WBB provides you with all the opportunities to work on any specific weakness your dog has shown you, and to do it at any distance or angle you desire, as many times as you like – and the dog will not have returned to a pile of bumpers at any time during the drill. Every cast is fresh.

Whether you’re an e-collar trainer or a traditional type of trainer, WBB can promote sound fundamental handling skills in a unique way that many dogs – even dogs that don’t particularly enjoy drill work – tend to really have fun with. It isn’t new, it’s just good! And, oh yeah – did I mention that it’s flexible?
For live action instruction on Walking Baseball, complete with animated diagrams, see our new Walking Baseball DVD. Demonstrated with three dogs at three levels of development (Basic, mid-Transitional, and Advanced) we show you how to perform this casting-only drill effectively for dogs at all levels, and how to adapt it for developing handling skills, as well as maintaining them at the very highest level over your dog's working career!

47 minutes
only $12.95 plus $5 shipping & handling
Walking Baseball...made simple!
  

A Summer at CL-2: Memories of Rex

By Evan Graham

There are things that happen in life that are the result of planning. Others you participate in just by being in the right place at the right time. Sometimes the two mechanisms operate in concert with one another. I planned to go spend the summer learning from a man regarded by many as the greatest retriever trainer of all time, and certainly one of the greatest innovators. My wife and I farmed out the kids with relatives for the summer, loaded up our dog truck, and headed for Escalon, California to meet and train with Rex Carr.

I hoped for something about this experience to be profound or special in some way. I was not disappointed. Arriving in Escalon, an agricultural community near Modesto, we stopped and took a chance that someone would be able to direct us to Rex’s kennel. We asked someone at a large fruit market in town if they knew of Carr-Lab kennels or Rex Carr, a local dog trainer. “Oh, sure”, came the reply. Speaking as though he was directing us to the home of a movie star or some such celebrity, he gave us detailed directions. We soon came to know that Rex was regarded as a sort of celebrity in that town, and that, indeed, Hollywood stars like Bing Crosby had been frequent visitors to CL-2 over the years.

We were fortunate enough to have friends who were needing a house sitter while they vacationed in Europe for the summer, and that house happened to be situated exactly between Rex’s kennel in Escalon and his training grounds, “CL-2”, located on the outskirts of Oakdale. Still, even blessed with that logistical advantage, we usually arrived at CL-2 only to find Rex already there, and Curtis Jackson, his assistant, airing the dogs.

We met a tall, vigorous man who spoke in a manner that was truly all his own. I’m sure I can’t do justice to it, but it was sort of a combination of eloquence and crusty old dog trainer woven together with a clear effort to enunciate each word. Let me assure you that when you were corrected for a late whistle or mis-cast you understood each word clearly! He had a penetrating efficiency about his communication skills.

I will always be grateful for my wife’s note taking efforts. The volume of information we took home from that summer took years to appreciate and understand. It also required a humble willingness to learn, while overcoming some embarrassment before a host of other trainers. Penetrating lessons. Lessons that stay with me still. Since she was occupied with note taking, diagramming drills, and listening to Rex, I took the few photos of our summer with Rex.

I had been initiated to Rex’s method while working as an assistant trainer for John Hahn, a trainer from Great Bend, Kansas who had spent extensive time with Rex, and made bold strides in introducing this very different method to a Midwest crowd of field trailers. That introduction was met with a reflexive resistance. Rex was a true pioneer, and anyone daring to advance a method so different from convention was lumped into a group that was held at arms length for quite some time.

Even with my previous exposure to his method, I came to know a whole new perspective on retriever training under Rex’s direct tutelage. I recall that once, while ending a session with a special-needs dog, that Rex said, with a tear in his eye, “I love dogs better than anybody”. Rex spoke in earnest of his love for dogs, and anyone listening knew he meant it. It wasn’t out of joy that he applied a needed amount of pressure to solve some problem. It was his dedication to the best outcome for them.

He told wonderful stories of his experiences with so many great dogs over the years, and none more plentiful than those about “Soupy” (NFC-NAFC Super Chief). Just before beginning a session one morning he told of a situation with Soupy at his home. Soupy, he said, slept on a small rug by his bed. He was very obedient about staying on that rug until he was called. As a part of his morning ritual, Rex would have breakfast while Soupy remained on his rug in the bedroom. Rex would then step out the door to see if the dog truck had been brought up from the kennel, and then he would call Soupy to come and load up for the day.

His wife had told him that, when he stepped outside to check on the truck, Soupy had begun to creep into the kitchen looking to see if Rex was watching. One morning Rex proceeded with his usual routine, except that he opened the door, then closed it, and remained inside, quietly standing just out of sight of the kitchen door where Soupy had been creeping in - seeking treats, most likely!

Rex said, “I could hear his toe nails clicking on the floor as he crept into the kitchen”. Just as Soupy entered the kitchen, Rex looked around the doorway and yelled, “kennel!” He said Soupy was so startled that he ran into one door jam, then the other, before finally managing to scamper through the doorway and down the hallway to the bedroom – his toenails losing traction on the slick floor in a frantic effort to escape the consequences! Rex said he and his wife were laughing too hard to be angry with him! Wonderful stories, one after another.

What struck me most, of course, was how much thought went into the drills and exercises he constructed. This was a remarkable departure from the usual pattern blinds and marking set-ups, so common to other trainers I had seen. We ran multiple marks, and some mark and blind combinations, of course. But, it was the developmental steps that really caught my imagination. That, and all the drills to re-establish skill levels that had eroded through a lack of maintenance.

Maintenance was a big issue to Rex, and a frequent topic of discussion. When we would break for lunch at the old picnic table under the only tree that provided shade from the summer heat at CL-2, we would listen to more stories, discuss maintenance problems and solutions, and ask questions that I’m sure he had heard a thousand times over the years. People would ask things like, “Rex, why didn’t you handle dogs in field trials?” Or they would ask something equally as predicable as, “Where did you learn to train?” He was gracious in answering, even though I’m sure he had provided such answers to many people before.

Deepening the impact of this new view of retriever training was having the chance to speak with some of the other trainers who came while I was there. Judy Aycock, Delma Hazzard, Jessie Kent, Caroline Kruze, Dennis Luddington, and others who were so kind as to make us feel welcome, also gave outstanding illustrations of how fieldwork should (and sometimes should not) be applied in Rex’s method. Attention to detail, and a careful focus on making the work more doable, guided dogs to success with fewer corrections, while re-exposing them to those concepts on subsequent retrieves in the many drills we ran, provided a theme that permeated my wife’s notes.

I diagrammed many of the drills, and have created some drills of my own based on those principles. I remember those principles well. Even more, though, I remember the time I was permitted to experience with a master trainer, Rex Carr.


After Initial Force Work

Suggested progression following Force Fetch and Force-to-Pile

 
Starting pattern blinds, basic Double marks, steadying
 
Your dog now retrieves on command, rather than merely by impulse. This control allows you to get an early start on basic pattern blinds. It’s simple and fun, so let’s get started.
 
First, I would like to make it clear that when I speak of pattern blinds that I am referring to taught blinds that are intended to be run a number of times for the purpose of establishing confidence, and teaching skills.
 
Pattern blinds are not cold blinds. They are tools to get a young dog going on blinds, and doing it with confidence and style. When you transition your dog to a cold blind standard, you will leave pattern blinds behind because the mental processes they involve work against the cold blind standards, such as casting. More on this later.
 

You will begin by setting up a 3-legged pattern with blinds about 40 yards in length. The

blinds are 90 degrees apart, as the diagram shows.


Set a pile of at least four bumpers at each designated spot. Carry a bumper in your pocket for identifying the first pile. Bring your dog to the apex (identified as “Dog runs from here” in diagram). Start with the right hand blind by walking your dog out to it and sitting him facing it, about three to five feet away. Using the bumper to identify the pile, toss it into the pile and send the dog on “Fetch”. Enforce any refusals with the ear, but such occurrence is unlikely, at this point.
 
Back up a few feet and throw the bumper into the pile again. Send the dog, backing up a few more feet as he goes. This time when he returns and delivers the bumper, send him for one of the planted bumpers without re-identifying the pile. If you need to help the dog, it would be preferable at this point to just throw a bumper into the pile to clear up his confusion. If he went without help, back up a little at a time until he is running the full 40 yards on this blind.
 
If this went very smoothly, and the weather will permit, you can teach another leg. If significant confusion caused slow progress on this blind come back tomorrow and re-teach it until he gets it smoothed out. Usually this does not require much effort to get going for a well-forced dog.
 
Keep working on this over how ever many days it takes until the dog reliably goes stylishly on all 3 blinds. After about 3 to 5 days of running these little blinds with no need for correction you can start to set up a new one with blinds 60 to 70 yards. You must read a confident attitude about running these first blinds before it is really fair to extend the distances, though. Alternate the order of retrieves, running each blind once per session.
 
Steadying
 
I regard steadying as a step, and a process. Some of it has already begun in the formation of good habits while at heel. If a dog breaks to wing and shot he has violated “sit”.
Creeping is a form of breaking, and should be dealt with in the same manner.
 
To be fair with the dog, it is best not to just start sticking him for breaking on his marks. Instead, I suggest an honoring scenario in which your dog is far enough from the working dog that he isn’t a significant distraction, but where he can clearly see the mark/marks being thrown.
 
He should be told to “sit”. That is all he should be allowed to do. This is a completely taught and forced command, at this point in his life. That means it has been formalized into a standard for which he is now accountable to comply with. Don’t use any more stick pressure than is needed to keep him sitting while he watches the other working dogs. It usually only requires a couple such sessions to prepare him to become steady for his own marks.
 
Be patient about elevating this standard for your dogs own marks, and remember that this skill will require ongoing maintenance.
 
Basic double marks
 
Basic double marks are 180 degrees opposite of each other. There should be no attempt to expose the dog to doubles with any conflict in their proximity until he handles proficiently. You have done memory drills at younger ages, so he has been prepared to retrieve from memory as well as impulse. To begin the process of teaching the dog to do doubles in the field use the delayed double procedure for retrieving double mark set- ups as singles, as follows:
v    
Your memory mark should be the shorter of the two, at first. Encourage success, and confidence will follow. An example would be to set up a double marking set-up with a short mark (about 20 yards), and another at about 75 yards away, 180 degrees opposite the short one. Run the longer mark first as a single. When the dog returns, require him to heel in to you and sit facing the short one with the bird still in his mouth. Leave the bird in his mouth while the short mark is thrown. Once the short bird is on the ground, take the bird from him and allow the dog to retrieve the new one. This gets him used to a slight delay, instead of the “Ready-set-go” tempo on the singles he has had in the past.
 
Following a couple of weeks initiation to the delayed double procedure, begin basic 180 doubles. Use the same configuration, but teach as doubles by throwing the short bird first, and running it as a single. Then throw it again, but restrain the dog from retrieving with a lead or rope, turn him 180 degrees and have the longer mark thrown. Send the dog quickly while he is focused on it. When he returns, sit him by your side, facing the memory mark. Take the first bird, and send him for the memory mark. There really should be no problem with this because this is essentially the function he has learned while being taught to run pattern blinds.
 
These basic double mark set-ups should be run on open ground, with as few terrain features, and as little cover as possible. There should be as little opportunity for failure as you can arrange.
 
It would be best to start with bumpers to throw, and transition into birds, as the dog shows that he is confident in doing these simple doubles. This is usually rather easy, but, if you see a problem with bird handling, i.e. dropping, mouthing, etc., then clean it up right away by stopping this exercise. Go, immediately to your equipment for a lead and a single bumper.
 

Do a “Walking fetch” session, alternating the use of a bumper for several repetitions, and then inserting a bird (frozen pigeons are best) every other time, evolving into using the bird every time. When this is smoothed out, use birds every time.

From here you have a strong foundation to build upon through the transition to a fully-trained retriever! Good training!
 

Excerpt from Smartwork for Retrievers, Basics and Transition volume one


 
 
An 

American 

Perspective

On Field Trials and Hunt Tests

By Evan Graham


Photo by Dale Tolmsoff  
American dog sports for retrieving breeds have a relationship to actual fieldwork that is sometimes less than obvious, and that is the focus here. It doesn’t require much imagination to understand that hunting dogs get better with experience on game birds, and these events are a vehicle to accomplishing that. But there is much more. Like the UK trials, American dog sports promote competition, and that tends to elevate standards. Field Trials provide competition in a dog vs. dog venue, while Hunt Tests offer a ‘dog vs. an established standard’ platform for testing.
 

The intent of this commentary is to provide a brief history of the events, and what will hopefully be a useful insight into these pursuits. It’s significant to note that even in the U.S. there is a great deal about Field Trials, and even Hunt Tests, that many casual observers have difficulty understanding.

 

In the beginning

 

The history of American Field Trials, as events governed by the American Kennel Club, dates back to the 1930’s. Prior to that there were trials held according to traditional British rules, with the fortunes of the Retriever breeds in America, and the Labrador in particular, being tied to the fortunes of wealthy, Eastern estate owners who, being accustomed to shooting in Scotland, began to import Labs from the British Isles in the late 1920s and early 1930s.

 

The first Labrador Retriever was registered with the AKC in 1917. Not only has the Labrador become the most popular breed in America, the Lab clearly dominates the retriever gun dog sports here, as well. The loveable Lab is welcomed in many ways in U.S. households, with 165,970 of them being registered with the AKC in 2001, ranking them well ahead of any other breed of any type.

 

Still, American Field Champions have been crowned in other breeds over the years. Goldens, Chesapeakes, and even Flat Coated Retrievers have earned those titles. The same is true of Hunt Test titles, such as MH (Master Hunter).

 
There are several organizations that sanction Hunt Tests, each with its own distinctive style. The objectives are sufficiently alike that I will forgo listing the rules for each. Instead, I would like to offer a descriptive commentary on the events in order to promote a better understanding of them for those who have not had the opportunity of seeing them.
The end result in both events (hunt tests and field trials) is the revealing of core attributes in dogs for selective breeding, while providing an enjoyable pursuit for dog enthusiasts.
 

Field Trials, the least understood of American dog sports

 

1931 saw the organization of the Labrador Retriever Club, which put on the first field trial for Retrievers in America on an eight thousand acre estate in Chester, New York-deliberately holding it on a Monday so that it would not attract a gallery. The event of that day, and of this are separated by far more than an expanse of time!

 
There is a provision in the AKC rulebook for retriever field trials that, while it has been present for decades, has become purely ornamental: Under Basic Principles, “1.
The purpose of a Non-Slip Retriever trial is to determine the relative merits of Retrievers in the field. Retriever field trials should, therefore, simulate as nearly as possible the conditions met in an ordinary day's shoot.”
 
While U.S. trials continue to provide evidence of “the relative merits” of Retrievers in the field, the only way in which the “conditions met in an ordinary day's shoot” are observed is with regard to the very difficult natural terrain in which they are conducted, along with the retrieval of game birds; principally ducks and pheasant.
 
The cosmetic appearance of today’s Field Trials is a two-edged sword. While they are the vehicles that allow the conducting of uniform tests with uniform objectives, they are of such a contrived appearance that the casual observer is left scratching his/her head, and wondering, “what on earth does this have to do with hunting dogs?” Opinions vary.
 
These events have come to test isolated attributes in working retrievers to the extent that they have an almost clinical appearance, even in the beautiful wild areas in which they are conducted. The clinical-type dynamics, and the diverse natural environment have become a team of logistical bedfellows. Because the nature of the event has evolved, both are necessary.
 

The degree of difficulty in the tests for these events has swelled exponentially, creating the need for a more contrived looking set up, while consideration for the dog has necessarily remained. The variation in cover and terrain, along with the need for certain types of water, shoreline, and combinations of all of these, must exist to test the core attributes of working retrievers, insomuch as that may be done uniformly. It is, indeed, the testing of those core attributes that has become the central focus of the dynamics of today’s trials.

 

It has long been recognized that distance has the effect of making all retriever work more difficult, so exceptional distance has become the hallmark of many tests in American Field Trials. It causes the erosion of control by a handler, and exacerbates the effects of all the diverting influences that retrievers face in their work. That deserves some explanation.

 

Distance

 

Judges in trials must possess sufficient dog knowledge to understand how dogs are influenced by certain conditions. A marked retrieve at twenty yards on a surface as featureless as a putting green should be a minimal challenge, even to a puppy. Make that same mark two hundred yards and the challenge is much greater. Add in cover, changing terrain, a crossing wind, water, re-entries, and so forth, and you continue to up the ante.

 

On a blind retrieve the erosion of control that occurs over extended distance is universally understood. Therefore blinds, especially in the upper classes, can be in excess of 400 yards, and can cover some amazing terrain.


Just an example of typical Midwestern terrain.

Marks

 

Here is an example of a fairly typical all-age marking test.

“G” indicates a gunner/thrower in the field. “X” denotes the area of the fall. This is what is known as an indented triple mark. The center mark is a memory bird, and is made difficult by being the ‘indent’ bird, along with several other considerations.

 

It is the second bird thrown, following the live shot flyer on the left. Then a long ‘control’ bird (dead bird) is thrown on the right. The dog will cross water, drive through a strip of dense cover, then across an open area, and out across an expanse of ploughed ground to get his first mark. Upon returning with that fall, his first memory mark is the indent, which is often retired; the gun/thrower becomes hidden so as not to provide a visual cue that would make the mark easier.

 

There are several natural tendencies in dogs that make this particular mark difficult. First, it is a memory mark. Then, it is placed so that a dog will tend to cheat both water and cover en route to it, placing them on a potentially perilous course toward the flyer on the left. If that fall is retrieved second, it establishes a preconceived notion about the line to be taken subsequently, and makes it even more difficult to succeed on the indent.

 

What’s being tested in a set up like this?

 

Let’s dissect this test to determine what is actually being tested. First, what is being tested is pure marking and memory. Bird placement and distance promote this. Second, trainability coupled with a willingness to cooperate with the handler. After all, from the perspective of most dogs, it would be far more enticing to go for the flyer on the left second. Only significant schooling (and trainability in the dog) are likely to allow the dog to retrieve that very difficult ‘indent’ mark second.

 

The third quality tested here is sagacity – a special type of intelligence in dogs that allows them to problem solve in highly challenging circumstances, such as a test like this one presents. Most dogs of hunting quality possess intelligence, but only the best are sagacious enough to sort out a test as fraught with challenges as this one with any consistency. In the upper classes of today’s field trials, most dogs entered are quite adept at this level of work, so the standards must be kept high.

 

Blind Retrieves


Since a blind retrieve is purely the result of training, control is the focus of such tests in

 U.S. trials. Dogs are judged against each other on the basis of comparative merit, so

great emphasis is placed on constructing tests that challenge control to very high degrees.


This is just one example of how a simple pasture and stock pond can become a viable test of control on a blind retrieve. This one is in the set-up phase, which allows its components to be easily seen. The close gun station is setting up to shoot a flyer mallard, while the blind is being placed on the far hill (about 250 yards). The line to this blind passes closely behind the gun station in order not to miss the water altogether. The hill drops down slightly beyond the gun station, so the handler will have to move up as the dog passes the gunners to keep his/her dog in sight. The dogs did not want to stay on line toward the far end of the pond, and many drove left instead of straight up the far hill to the bird.
 
Less direction given by the handler, coupled with stylish and accurate responses from the dogs, will keep a dog well positioned in the competition. Accuracy is a key feature, as it clearly demonstrates trainability and willingness to take direction from the handler. In order that these key traits are tested to a great enough extent to demonstrate the best of the field of dogs, these tests are carefully contrived with immensely challenging components.
 
Because the level of competition has continued to rise, a trial is rarely won with a good blind, but a poor one often loses them. Marking is of primary importance. It is of primary importance because is reflects most of the finest core attributes of a quality retriever, and that is what provides selective breeders with a tangible yardstick by which to continue to preserve and advance the retriever breeds for future generations. Marking is one way in which genetics are quantifiable.
 

The distinctions between Hunt Tests and Field Trials

 
In the late 1970’s a group of people, largely comprised of sporting dog writers and retriever trainers, decided that retriever sports needed to move in a different direction from the increasingly competitive, and more artificial looking field trials of the U.S.A., and set out to contrive a new game for the retriever enthusiast. Essentially, the point of greatest agreement appears to have been restoring an atmosphere in testing that conformed more to the ‘conditions met in an average day’s shoot’. It was felt that there were portions of the makeup of working retrievers that had disappeared as considerations in field trial testing, and that this new sport may help to promote them.
 
In addition, there were aspects of competition that these organizers were opposed to. Certainly more people would be apt to participate if they weren’t faced with early elimination because their dogs couldn’t perform well enough to be considered a potential winner. As long as they can do the work prescribed by the sanctioning body as being at a level appropriate for a dog in their class, a hunt test dog has an opportunity to continue in the event to earn a qualifying score toward a title at that level.
 
The ribbons are all the same for most of these events because there are no placements. A dog either meets the criteria for the class (in the judge’s view), or fails outright. The perspectives remain somewhat polarized between those who run hunt tests and those who compete in field trials. Most field trial competitors appear to maintain that the non-competitive venue erases the distinction of the better dogs for the sake of selective breeding. One dog with a Master Hunter title may have earned it in successive scores, for example, while another required years, attending dozens of tests to barely eek out enough scores to attain the same title, and neither had ever been required to distinguish itself as being the better dog in any given event or on any given day. To the hunt tester, it is enough that a dog was able to work at that level successfully enough times to acquire the necessary scores.
 
I view the differences in testing as being largely a matter of cosmetics and distance. A mark or blind retrieve of more than 300 yards would be the exception rather than the rule in a hunt test in any of the sanctioning organizations. Guns hidden vs. guns visible – and/or retired, handlers and guns in white vs. handlers and guns in camouflage – these represent the bulk of cosmetic differences between the events. Of course the primary difference is that dogs in field trials are competing to win, while hunt test dogs compete to match a standard set by the organization sanctioning it.
 
If the standard of performance rises in the hunt test venue, it will be the result of consensus within a governing body, rather than anything that occurs during a single event, like a field trial where someone must be declared the winner; the best of the best that weekend.
 
Gun stations in hunt tests are very rarely visible. Normally, the guns are hidden, but may walk out from a ‘hide’ to shoot a diversion mark, for example. Guns may also be visible for a ‘walk-up’ mark, as well. They’re great fun, and the judging is often very creative due to the effort being made to provide the look and feel of hunting conditions, while essentially testing the same traits that are tested in more clinical ways at field trials.

photo by Dale Tolmsoff
All participants are required to dress in either camouflage or natural colors. Often handlers carry guns, or mock guns. As in trials, game birds are used, and many concepts in marking and blinds are also used that are merely different looks at the same ones used in trials.

In both events, onlookers and newcomers are welcomed. In both cases, the dogs are the central focus, with a majority of participants being avid hunters.

Cause and Effect Trouble Shooting Training Problems
By Evan Graham

Stuff happens.

 

You love to hunt, and you may very well love to run hunt tests, and/or field trials. It’s all great fun, and a wonderful challenge to train your dog for all of the pursuits you enjoy. While actually doing the work, especially under judgment, it is natural for certain aspects of your dog’s training to erode. He gets excited, and …well, stuff happens!

 

The dog that remains by your side in training now creeps 10 yards on each bird while hunting, or at a test or trial. His typically very good hearing seems to fail him when you take him to one of these events. His casting only changes his course about half as well as it does in training. And the little stinker breaks on honors! He has begun to bolt for the line as soon as you take his leash off in the holding blind. Or you let him out of the vehicle when you’re out hunting and off he goes into the darkness!

 

If none of this sounds familiar, you are clearly not hunting enough, nor are you running tests or trials! Or, you are running a dog that takes sedatives. Or, just maybe… you are running them smart!

 

You may just be running a test/trial, and then staying home to train for a week or two before competing or testing again. You may be in the tiny percentage of trainers who are wise and self-controlled enough not to overdo it. Your dog spends far more time in a controlled environment (training) compared to the amount of time he spends in an uncontrolled environment (testing/trialing or hunting), so he doesn’t tend to fall apart when he is there. He tests and hunts pretty much as he trains. He’s a rare dog. You are a rare human…

 

…Or not, in which case you stand in need of this message on how to keep a balance sufficient to maintain a fundamentally sound dog. That is the goal; to maintain a fundamentally sound dog…a balanced dog.

 
Make it count!
 

This article is as much devoted to understanding how humans work, as it is to knowing how dogs work. When you observe a dog with training problems, you are seeing symptoms that were almost certainly created directly, or indirectly, by a human. Any experienced pro can tell you this. We mean well, but we get caught up in how much fun the dogs are and how much fun we have hunting and testing them. We also have limitations, like available time or facilities.

 

When you‘re sick, your body sends you messages. You have pain. You feel lousy. You get weak. If you are wise, you learn to listen to your body. You take care of the problems your body says you need help with.

 

It’s like that with your dog’s training sometimes. His casting just doesn’t alter his course like it used to. He creeps, or tries to switch, or he pops on marks. His skills are “sick”. They are sending you messages. His once well-tuned abilities are weak. They look lousy, and are almost painful to watch! Stuff happened.


If you have a headache, and only take a pain reliever, you may very well get over it and continue in generally good health. But, if you have chronic headaches, pain relievers alone will only help temporarily, and may mask some developing health problem that you need a real cure for.

 

If your dog’s skills have become “sick”, and the problems you see are becoming chronic, you need to take measures that will cure the problem, not just mask it. But you must understand that the problems you are addressing may not be cured with some magic bullet; an easy cure-all. We are talking about behavior, and the need to modify it. How you go about it will make all the difference in its lasting effects.

 

Knowing how dogs acquire a habitual behavior will also help you to understand how to go about mending behavior that has become a problem. Habits, whether good or bad, don’t just disappear. They are replaced with different ones. The dog that once stopped sharply to the whistle may now require fifteen or twenty steps to come to a stop. Further, he may now only crouch instead of sitting. Or, he may just stand there and look back at you. Worst of all, he may now do this chronically. That has become his habit, and it’s probably driving you nuts!

 

You can take superficial steps in a training session that seems to have corrected a problem, and then notice that he’s right back at it in no time. That is because you haven’t changed his habit. You only did something one day that made it look better…for a while. The habit remains.

 
Finding a cure
 

Sometimes you can work on more than one problem at a time, because a certain drill or exercise managed to provide a co-benefit or two as you addressed some specific problem. Generally, though, it’s best to focus on one problem at a time. First things first.

 

You may have identified a problem to work on already. Take stock of the whole dog. Give him a check-up. Isn’t all this medical talk invigorating? It’s a very similar approach. Your doctor or nurse isn’t treating your bad heart. They’re treating you; the patient with a bad heart. Heart patients often have other problems that need addressing besides just their heart. Or they often have other health issues that have contributed to what has become a heart problem.

 

You aren’t fixing a pop. You are training a dog that pops. Popping is a problem your dog has, so you want to fix it. But, have you really identified what’s wrong with your dog? Is popping his only problem? If you have learned about other problems your dog has, is popping his most important one? If you don’t assess all potential problems in your dog’s training, how can you correctly prioritize? How do you know that what you have decided to work on first is what was most important for your dog?

 

If you periodically give your dog a training check-up, you may save both of you some trouble by treating the little problems before they become big ones. Some of you have heard this speech from you doctor, haven’t you? It is a principle that works. It works for your health, and it works for the health of your dog’s training. After all his behavior, much like ours, is driven by his emotional health status.

 

As a pro trainer, I had a truckload of dogs in my care, most of which were hunting dogs, as well as field trial competitors. I never had a field trial dog that didn’t hunt. My job was to keep each one running at a level near his or her individual peak as much of the time as possible. Sure I had the usual health and hygiene issues that any dog owner/trainer deals with, but the lion’s share of my time was spent in the field honing, or repairing their skills.

 

I came up with a troubleshooting check-up, which I gave my dogs monthly; the same way I was paid. That’s how I knew where I was with each dog. That’s how we stayed competitive running as many as twenty-six trials in a year. It involves keeping a journal of each dog’s training. It tracks progress, as well as problems.

 

When I reported to the owners of the dogs I was training, it wasn’t just a progress report. It was a health status record. I reported the state of the dog’s progress, but also the state of his maintenance. That reflected more accurately what we were doing in training to advance him, and to evaluate his strengths and weaknesses. Some clients appreciated it more than others, but I required it of myself.

 
If your dog has been cheating exits on water blinds
 lately, is this a recurrent theme in his training? Has it always been so? Does it seem to you that it’s new for him? Know your dog, so you can address things in the priority they deserve. Don’t put a patch on a problem that has shown you that it will keep coming up through inadequate maintenance.
 
Hypothetical problem
 
“My dog is always looking for a way out of the water on water blinds, especially at a distance.” There are a number of ways to look at this problem, especially when it is occurring during the running of a water blind. Of course you will want to work toward a solution at that time, as well you should. But, this problem keeps coming up, even though you feel you are dealing with it consistently.
Let’s see if your approach is actually dealing with a cure for the problem, or if your treatment of it is only addressing it superficially.
 
As your dog progresses toward the end of a water blind, the line to it takes him closer to a distant shoreline, and, as expected, he begins to gravitate toward the shore. You can really feel the influence growing because the closer he gets to the shoreline the less course correction he yields with each cast. He may even begin to be more sluggish about stopping to the whistle, even though you’re certain he still hears it.
 
Your response to what is happening might typically be to give bigger casts away from shore; casts that are more straight “over” instead of casting the dog literally toward the fall. You may also wait a little longer to cast the dog after stopping him in order to heighten his focus. You may even stop the dog and call him toward you before re-stopping and casting him onward again. All of those things are good handling techniques that can improve the dog’s relationship to the fall. They are all things a good handler does to help his or her dog to succeed at a blind.
 
Succeeding at blinds does not constitute a solution to shoreline suction, although upholding standards has beneficial effects. The problem you continue to see in your dog has a source. It is that source you need to address or the problem will keep continue to be a large and nagging one.
 

If chronic headaches are caused by a problem with a blood vessel, only repairing the blood vessel in some definitive way will solve the problem. Pain relievers will merely help you to live with the problem for a while, masking symptoms. All too soon the pain relievers won’t be able to help anymore. You need a real cure.


 This dog that wants out of the water at a distance will continue to want out sooner and sooner until the real problem is addressed. This dog has preconceived notions that tell him it’s faster and easier to run on land, and that he still lacks any responsibility to follow a standard of performance that requires him to take direction as given, whether on land or in the water. A solution for this will be a program that replaces his current mindset with one that dictates a different standard, and promotes a changed inner desire in the dog toward compliance.
 
Simplify
 
Break the work down into a simple focused form, and repeatedly expose the dog to the standard of behavior responsible for a more consistent desirable result. If you have ever wondered why the term “drill” comes up so much in dog training these days, you have just discovered an answer. Drills offer repeated exposure to focused concepts in training. As dogs repeat any specific concept in their work they develop and deepen habits of behavior. That also makes drill work a great way to cure bad habits by literally replacing them with good habits.
 
Start your drills with a simple, easy standard. Short distances help to keep control of the dog low key, and allow the dog to succeed easily at the focus of the drill. Gradually extend distance to deepen the new habit by extending and deepening skill levels, like holding a straight line in water in the presence of a tempting shoreline. This can be done by running many cheating single marks with diagonal shoreline exits, and/or Tune up drills that have numerous water blinds with varying degrees of diagonal exit, at slightly increasing distances. These exercises promote a solid standard of not falling for shoreline suction. By strengthening the core skills involved, your dog can soon return to full-scale fieldwork with his new sound habits intact, requiring far fewer corrections. Further, he will have experienced so much success that his attitudes toward the standards he once resisted will have softened considerably.
 

This same philosophical approach can be applied to myriad other training problems. Drill work is the very essence of attrition, and tends to produce outstanding results. Good training!

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


On your mark… get set…’fetch’


Having a solid foundation of obedience in your dog, and having taught "hold", it's time to embark on the actual force fetching process.

 

Once you have decided on a place to do your work, and have chosen a fetch object, begin by taking a little time to relax your dog. Don’t throw retrieves for him. Just walk with him a little, and keep structure (commands) to a minimum.

 

Choose where you’ll begin, and tell him to sit. Hopefully that will be the last obedience command you’ll need. If it isn’t, that’s okay, but keep that as a goal. Using proper technique will help with this. Look at the picture above. Note that the dog is sitting (the product of solid prior obedience training), and that the trainer has three fingers looped through the collar. That grip will go a long way toward controlling his upper body.

 You must expect that your dog will squirm or try to escape pressure for a while, even though you will start with very light pressure. Initially, you may have to go ahead and remind him to sit before moving on with this session, and that is fine. Try to use your grip for control, and stay away from other commands.

It looks like the trainer is pinching, but this depicts a firm hold on the earflap. The earflap is pressed against the tang of the collar, making the tang the pressure point. The remaining fingers are looped under the collar strap to control the dog’s upper body. The ear is not really ever pinched.

 

n the first photo the trainer’s last three fingers looped under the dog’s collar, leaving the thumb and forefinger free. With the thumb and forefinger hold the flap of the dog’s ear so that you can control the part of the outer flap that will contact the pressure point. The pressure point is the tang on the buckle of the collar. Nylon or leather collars work fine for this, and usually have a buckle with a prominent tang. As seen above, the flap of the ear is held in a manner that allows good control.

*Note: I recommend starting with the outer earflap making contact with the pressure point because you don’t know what your dog’s sensitivity level is yet. If you need to do more to illicit a proper response to pressure you can simply turn the earflap over to expose the inner surface to the pressure point, rather than simply getting heavy with the actual pressure.

 

The idea is to turn pressure on and off like a light switch, using only the amount of pressure needed at the time. Doing it this way gives you control of amount of pressure, and allows you to keep the ear in hand, rather than releasing it. That’s important!

We’ll get to why it’s important to keep the ear in hand a bit later. First we need to clearly cover the process and the principles that drive it. Remember, this is a force-taught (or force-conditioned) command. The mechanism needs to operate by a consistent standard to be maximally effective.
 
Turning off pressure
 

When you obedience trained your dog you taught him how to do certain things first. You guided him into a sit position and praised him for doing it. This was very passive and teaching-oriented, as it should be. When you applied pressure to formalize that training your dog understood how to comply already, and you taught him to turn off pressure through compliance. Using pressure to formalize training consistently follows that path of logic.

 
When you force fetch your dog he doesn’t know how to turn off the pressure because he doesn’t know what you want yet. That’s why we need to be as fair about this as possible when we begin. It calls upon us to use very little pressure, and to guide the desired behavior carefully; showing the dog how to turn off the pressure. The teaching and the forcing all happen together.
 
When you begin to place pressure on the dogs’ ear for the first time you can, again, expect some bugging. If you do it right there will be far less of it. Doing it “right” simply means starting with minimal pressure – reading the dog by watching his eyes and paying attention to fine details of his body language.
 
When you begin with pressure you may likely notice a change in the dogs eye position and general character that tells you he is uncomfortable. That’s all you need to get started. You know that he would like to get rid of this annoyance, and you can show him how to do it.
 
Place the object in his mouth, saying, “Fetch” as you do. When you have successfully placed it in his mouth release the pressure and say, “Hold”. If he holds as directed, stroke his head with no verbal praise.
 
Allow me to be more specific regarding the mechanics:
v    
For the introduction to this command, I pull up a chair and sit down next to the dog. As usual, the dog is wearing an e-collar – either a dummy collar, or a deactivated real one. I don’t actually pinch the ear between my thumb and forefinger, as many trainers do. I hold the ear between the thumb and forefinger and press the ear against the tang on the collar buckle as a contact point; effectively turning pressure “on and off” like a light switch. For control of the dogs’ upper torso, as well as convenience in holding the ear as mentioned, I loop the remaining three fingers under the collar. The “three-finger hold”, and the ear hold between the thumb and forefinger are constant throughout the procedure. I don’t let go of either one. All that changes is whether I’m putting pressure on the collar tang for fetch enforcement.
 
I am not interested in whether the dog vocalizes or not. I am not seeking such a response, although some dogs vocalize with very little pressure. I’m not worried about avoiding it, but I’m not seeking it as an indicator of sufficient pressure. What I am interested in is a clear indication that the dog is experiencing enough discomfort that he would like to turn it off. If he insists that more pressure be applied before he will yield, he will get more, until he does yield.
 

Be patient about turning up the heat too early in the process, though. Many dogs have a proclivity to “clam”, or lock up as a fear response to pressure. This can exist in varying amounts, according to the individual dog. Most of the time you can work through it by just being patient, and showing the dog that this moderate amount of pressure can be gotten rid of by merely fetching. Resort to turning up the heat ONLY after many repetitions with more moderate pressure.


At first the bumper is placed in the dogs’ mouth. Begin by saying, “fetch” while applying just enough pressure to see signs of discomfort. You will likely need to place the roller or bumper in the dog’s mouth at first, but when he receives it release the pressure instantly, and stroke him gently. Don’t over do praise here. This may require many repetitions to condition the dog to see that having this object in his mouth is a relief, but stay with it, and do it the same way each time.
 
As he begins to reach for it, hold the bumper very close so he will easily meet with success. Gradually extend the distance from the dogs’ mouth so that he reaches for it. When he shows that he is willing to work to turn off the pressure, you know that you have gotten the ball rolling, so to speak.
 
*Note: Do not test the dog on this command during this process. He isn’t trained yet.
”Fetch
” is not a standard, and it will become one much more slowly if you turn it into fight, filled with corrections for failures that resulted from a lack of education. Many people inquire of me whether they’ve done something wrong while force fetching, and then reveal that their dog did fine while they followed the procedure, but then they tried it without pressure, or without holding the collar, or some other critical component. Then it all fell apart! This takes time. It’s conditioning.
 
Stay with having the dog fetch the roller/bumper from directly in front of him for numerous fetches to get him well conditioned. You should see clearly that he understands the relationship between having the roller in his mouth, and pressure being relieved. Don’t move on any further with this until you see this clearly. The best indicator is when he begins to open his mouth, and not require you to place it in there on command. The next, and even clearer indicator of this is when he begins to reach for it. That is something of a milestone.
 
It starts with you reading your dog to see discomfort. If he is vocal, fine. If he isn’t vocal, that’s fine too. Just read him and condition him, and watch for these little transitions to occur that will demonstrate when he begins to “get it”.

 


Look at this dog’s expression.

This isn’t a dog in agony. She’s uncomfortable, and that means you have an opportunity to show her how to relieve that discomfort. You will associate that act with a verbal command (fetch), and that is what gets this entire process going. Soon your dog will be reaching out to grab the roller/bumper on command (combined with pressure). Gradually extend the distance you hold the roller from the dog to get her moving a little at a time. As you do this you will start the dog taking a few steps toward the roller.

 

Expand on the reaching response, again by reading your dog so you don’t advance too fast. It’s often a matter of baby steps in the beginning, as your dog deepens his understanding of the process of turning off pressure by fetching. They all learn at individual rates.

 

Excerpt from the upcoming new book, SmartFetch

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


 

Two-sidedness

A look inside the practice of two-sided heeling

By Evan Graham

 

As I tend to view modern retriever training, the issue of two-sided heeling is fairly small in significance, but tends to draw no small amount of attention. It must be noted that sometimes small things can make a big difference when it matters. It’s unusual to watch in practice if you haven’t had much exposure to it, and it isn’t as easy to understand as it may appear on the surface.

 

There are techniques used by many people in the handling of retrievers in all of the work they do, and in competition you’ll see even more of them employed. When you’re trying to be the best at something – to win against many worthy competitors – in difficult circumstances it calls upon you to spare no effort. The practice of running a dog from either side is just one more way to attempt to provide a dog with an edge against failure. How does it do that? To understand that we first need to examine the influences that certain elements of tests tend to have on dogs.

 

Diversion Pressure

 

“Isn’t a diversion just a mark that distracts a dog during another retrieve?” I think that describes a pretty widely accepted view of what a diversion is to retrievers. But, the term diversion has a much broader meaning than that.

 

Diversion: 1 – from divert; to turn from a course or purpose, 2: element in a test or training exercise that provides the effect of diverting the otherwise direct route of the trained retrieve

 

The above is a definition I took from a dictionary and expanded its meaning as to directly apply to dog work. It implies that any influence (like a crossing wind), physical factor (like a log in the path of the retrieve route), or mechanical component (like a field trial or hunt test set up in with a mark placed in a strategically influential spot) that has the effect of turning a dog from his course (the route to the fall) or purpose (the completion of the retrieve) has diverted it. All of these things have come to be called “factors”, a term becoming increasingly familiar to retriever trainers.

 

 


The “Cardinal Influences”

 

I maintain that there are three mechanisms by which dogs are diverted in the course of a retrieve. I refer to them as the Cardinal Influences:

 

1)      Flare

2)      Suction

3)      Drift

There are many factors that exert these influences on dogs; things like old falls, poison birds, cover, diagonal terrain features, shoreline suction, gun stations, crosswind, just to name a few. The effects that these factors exert upon dogs all fall under one or more of the above categories.

 

Retrievers that function at, or near their potential, do so having frequent maintenance on overcoming diversion pressure on both marked and blind retrieves. Training aside, what influence can a handler use to help a dog overcome, or at least decrease the effects of those influences?

 

Push vs. Pull

 

The terms push and pull describe the influence a handler exerts when moving “up” (forward) or “back” (backward) when the dog is at heel. A dog may also be ‘pulled’ when the handler steps slightly away from the dog – drawing the dog’s upper torso nearer, effectively turning or influencing the dog in that direction. Here’s a look at how it works.

 


Looking from behind the handler and dog we see a hip-pocket double mark arrangement. The shorter mark on the right will tend to have a ‘suction’ influence; pulling the dog toward it when he is en route to the longer fall. This can occur even when that mark has already been retrieved. We train against this, but a handler can do things to promote success, as well.

 

“Push”


When a handler recognizes that a test, or set of circumstances may have this type of influence on the dog, he may provide a helpful influence by using “push”; stepping up or forward as the dog remains sitting in the same spot. Clearly this requires high quality obedience. Just as clearly your dog’s field of vision is effectively reduced to focus on the long mark, as in this illustration. That can help to keep the dog focused on it while the marks are falling, as well.

 

Stepping up (push) will tend to influence a dog left when he is heeled/positioned on the left side, and right when heeled on the right. This is a more direct (or active) application of influence than stepping back (pull).

 

When we consider doing things like stepping up or back to provide a push or pull influence, we must remember that these are only helps to the dog in the form of nuances. They do not replace training. They only augment it in practical ways.

 

“Pull”


One consideration for the application of the pull influence is in this type of marking set up when you have had your dog watch the long fall go down and now want to make certain he sees the short fall clearly. While this is normally not a problem, it is some insurance against the likelihood of the dog over focusing on the long fall to step back and open up his field of vision. Both falls matter, and the long one will be of little consequence if your dog misses the short one!

 

There are other examples of pull being useful, such as in different multiple marking configurations. Consider this one:


While this illustration does not show a typical positioning of a dog to run this set up, it does show that a handler in the neutral position shown leaves the dog with a full field of vision to see all guns and falls. Usually, in a set up configured like this one, the dog would be on the left because the left hand mark is thrown last and falls left of the gun. If, however, the handler reads that seeing that left hand fall is not likely to cause as much of a problem as the right hand mark, it may be preferable to position the dog on the right so the handler can step up to influence the dog to see that fall as it is thrown. Doing so would tend to reduce the dogs field of vision on the left.

All of the impact of push and pull apply to moving as birds fall during a set up or test, in that they can provide assistance to your dog to see critical falls and to reduce head swinging. Again, this is not to say that it replaces training for these functions, but rather helps to support that training when you are working for top performance.

 

There are other considerations regarding leveraging for lines to falls, especially on blind retrieves. So many factors and influences in each set of circumstances affect such a decision that writing about it, without going into exorbitant detail, is not practical.

 

How much help is it?

 

The actual impact of this tool is different for each dog in each situation. But, if you recognize the value of push and pull on one side, you should be able to easily calculate the extra edge it could give you to have the opportunity of doing it on either side. Time and practice will do more to provide you with your own sense of how to use this little tool best.

 

“It feels awkward to run a dog on my right side!”

 

If you have held off from acquiring this skill and using it with your dog because you have become so accustomed to running him or her from your left side, remember, there was a time when that was awkward, too. Everything is new at some point. That shouldn’t keep you from adding something so potentially useful to your arsenal, should it?


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Swim-by for Any Dog!

By Evan Graham
 

Suppose you found a way to gain a high degree of control of your dog in the water. Further, imagine this method allowing you to have a real tool of communication with your dog so that he ended up not only doing better water work, but also enjoying that higher standard. The name of the tool I speak of is known by many trainers, and talked about often, but perhaps not as well understood as you might think.


With all my heart, I believe there is far more incorrect information circulated about Swim-by than anything close to being correct. That is likely the main reason that so many people, even those who understand that it can be important and valuable, don’t really know how to go about teaching it.
 
This presentation will hopefully provide a window that will provide a clearer view of one of the most valuable tools a retriever trainer can employ. We will cover how to do it step-by-step. In addition, an overview will be provided describing what swim-by is and what its purposes are.
 
  “What is Swim-by supposed to accomplish?” 
 
In other words, what is swim-by for? What does it provide? 

Control. 


Yes, control – and even more. Control in water is widely recognized as being more difficult to attain in many ways than control on land. Water obscures many boundaries that are more easily clarified and defined on land. That makes the rules less clear and success more illusive for the kind of work we require of retrievers in hunting, hunt tests, and especially in field trials. 

On a fundamental level, how can you expect to be able to cast a dog off of land at 150 yards if you can’t reliably cast him off of land at 50 yards – or 50 feet? Yes, even casting a dog into water at 50 feet requires control, and it’s a fundamental skill that translates into many practical applications. Training a dog to perform a reliable swim-by can go a long way in providing the necessary control for this type of water work. But there is much more to be gained by it.

 

I’ve spoken in terms so far that may sound familiar. I want to make it clear, however, that swim-bys are not handling in the classic sense. Even when they are executed in the way a standard handling function is conducted they provide a very valuable tool, but there is yet more to be gained. It would be beneficial to have someone give you a ride in his or her car ¾ of the way to a destination to which you would otherwise have had to walk. But why stop and walk the other ¼ of the trip when the driver would have taken you there by car? Likewise, why settle for only a portion of the benefits of swim-by when there is so much more to be gained?

 

The control required to cast off of land into water, whether coming or going, calls upon the same core mental processes. The ability to readily do it provides a vehicle to teach other important water concepts.
 
What your dog needs in order to be successful at Swim-by
 
Strong basics, including force fetch, force to pile, and a thorough course in land tee work should be considered the minimum preparation for starting a dog on Water Tee/Swim-by. These mechanics make it easy for your dog to understand his job of going, stopping, and casting as a standard requirement.

 

I would strongly discourage any trainer from attempting to put a dog through this course of instruction without the previously mentioned basic education. It isn’t fair to the dog to expect even mediocre results otherwise.
 

Clear Messages

 

Handling a retriever is a vehicle of directing him to a specific destination; a fallen bird. Swim-by has an entirely different goal. When you cast a dog toward a fall you’re telling the dog “it’s right ‘over’ there”, or “it’s right ‘back’ there”. It is a language between you that can communicate effectively a message the handler desires the dog to receive and follow.


Swim-by also conveys a message, but it’s one that is markedly different than the one sent when handling to a fall. When a dog is cheating a return on a water retrieve, for example, he is sending a message of his own. In the words of the late Jim Kappes, the dog is saying, “less water”. It’s a very simple message, isn’t it? So is the message of swim-by. When your cheating dog heads to land, instead of returning straight to you in the water, he has made his statement.

 

Your response is a swim-by. The message you clearly send is “no”, ‘more water’! When you command a swim-by, the command is not “over”. It is “no”. ‘No’ says to a dog that what he is doing at that moment is wrong. It should always have said that, and in swim-by, it must say that in order to make your message clearly understood. Less water is wrong, and more water is right. Send clear messages.

 

I concede that doing swim-bys is useful and constructive, even if they are not executed in the manner I have described. I’m only suggesting that you reap the benefits of the entire tool. Take the full journey.
 

Teaching Swim-by

 

A small pond with water deep enough to require the dog to swim will do, but the ideal swim-by pond is rectangular with fairly steep banks. That will require the dog to be swimming all the time he’s in the water, and its shape clearly defines all the functions and rules of the swim-by.


When you begin to put all the functions of a Water T together you will both handle, and perform swim-bys. The rules are kept uniform for the purposes of clear teaching. The square areas depict where the piles will be placed for a fully functioning water T.

 

To begin teaching your dog the functions of casting from end-to-end of the forcing pond I recommend sitting the dog at one end and leaving him there, walking to the opposite end, and calling him to you enthusiastically. Meet the dog exactly where you desire him to exit. As he exits the water begin is first exposure to being permitted to leave it by telling him it’s okay to do so. Logically, I use the cue “okay”. I say, “okay” with enthusiasm as I throw him a very short fun bumper directly opposite the direction of the water. Repeat this 4 to 6 times in one direction and then do the same thing in the opposite direction.

You should then be able to sit your dog at one end of the pond and teach him to cast to the other end by tossing a bumper to the center of it, casting him toward it, and then walking the length of the pond to the opposite end, continuing to give a cast gesture as you do. This keeps it clear for the dog that this is how it’s done here.

 

This kind of clear teaching should make it easy for your dog to perform this clear simple act without confusion. It’s clear to the dog where the water is, and where the bumper is, as well as where you are when you reach the end of the pond. By repeating this swim from one end to the other repeatedly you make clear what is expected of the dog. You also make it fun for him by rewarding each journey with a fun bumper.

 

This is not a procedure in which there should be major battles. It’s low key, and high success in its application. The rules and the functions are clearly defined for the dog.


Finish this swim-by cast by meeting your dog at the opposite end, much as you originally taught him to do, by exiting where the other ‘over’ pile will be. Of course you will give him an enthusiastic “okay” as he leaves the water, and toss him a short fun bumper as before.

 

Repeat this several times in each direction to make the function clear for your dog. Avoid the common trap of testing as you train by ‘trying him out’ on a swim-by before you have completed all the preparatory steps. Be fair to him by giving him full instruction.

 

Putting it together

 

As you begin to put the pieces of this process together for your dog you will follow a logical progression. You have taught your dog to cast from end-to-end; right to left, and left to right. Then you taught him to do the exact same function, only while carrying a bumper in his mouth. You also taught him the release cue that tells him that he has your permission to exit the water (“okay!”). Your dog is only doing a kind of parlor trick so far because you haven’t shown him any practical context for these acts yet. That will be our next step.

 

Because your dog has already been casting both ways, from end-to-end, so many times it should be a very small easy transition to teach him to cast from the center of the pond. We’ll do that in the simplest way possible.

 

Using a single white plastic bumper approach the pond from the ‘line’ side – or point of origin. That is the starting point for performing all the functions of a water tee and swim-by. From here you will teach the dog where the back pile will be by tossing a bumper there, and sending him to it. This bumper should land on the far shore just barely on land so calling him back by water will be a non-issue. When the dog fetches the bumper you should whistle him in about halfway and give him his first real swim-by.

 

As he approaches the midway point of his return you say “no” while giving the cast gesture in the direction you want him to swim-by, and begin walking to that end of the pond and continuing to gesture.

 

*NOTE: There is a common tendency in the overwhelming majority of dogs to swim at an angle toward the far shore as they perform their first swim-bys, or to angle toward the near shoreline. Expect this and cast your dog away from the near shore as needed, or trill the come-in whistle as much as needed while continuing your swim-by cast gesture. This will teach your dog to follow the path he was originally taught it. Meet him exactly where you want him to exit, giving the “okay” to exit, followed by the usual fun bumper.


Do this several times in each direction to make the functions clear. Be sure your dog is performing these simple little swim-bys flawlessly before moving on.

 

Concert time!

 

Now that everyone knows their part and how to play it, it’s time to perform a full concert! All sections will now play in harmony and your dog will come to know the practical application of this goofy game the two of you have been playing. So far your dog probably hasn’t thought any of this has much to do with retrieving. It was just kind of a game you two were playing together because it had little resemblance to what you’ve done in the field so far, other than land T’s.


I recommend using white bumpers so your dog will have no problems finding a bumper during the exercise. Note that the piles are set with space between bumpers. You don’t want to encourage side issues like shopping the pile to crop up and dilute your lesson. I also suggest mowing at least the area where the piles are to be planted for the same reasons.

 

Running the Water Tee with Swim-by is performed much like your land tee work in that you will alternate sending your dog to the back pile without a handle, and sending him, stopping, and casting on about a 2 or 3 to 1 ratio; lining 2 or 3 times to each trip with a handle. The obvious difference is that you will not allow the dog to return by land on any retrieve.

 

On each cast to an over pile your dog will be given a swim-by. To get this started you will send the dog toward the back pile after 2 or 3 free passes to it, and walk the cast with him. You will meet the dog as he fetches a bumper from the pile and command the swim-by, saying, “no” as you give the cast gesture toward the water. Walk this cast the full distance to the opposite end of the pond and give the ‘okay’ as he exits (at the other pile), followed by a short fun bumper. Then return to the line and line the back pile at least once before repeating this.


Stay with your dog for a while on his swim-bys to keep other issues from interfering with the learning process that should be strictly focused on these functions. As your dog progresses in all of these functions while needing fewer correction for error (corrections that should be made with as little pressure as possible) you will begin to walk out these casts less and less until all functions can be executed with you remaining at the line. Remaining at the line to run a finished Swim-by involves simply remaining there, and, as the dog nears the shore where he will exit with bumper in mouth, give him permission to exit by saying , "okay"; meaning it's 'okay' to land. The dog should exit there and return by land to line the back pile, and the drill continues.

 

With most dogs it is a sound practice to stay with the Water Tee/Swim-by for several weeks, and to train as often as possible. During that time it would also be a good idea to adhere to a training regimen that provides marks each day, preferably before and after your water work.

 

Having completed the Swim-by, and keeping it maintained will give you a tool like no other. Maintenance and the teaching of advanced water work will become much easier for both you and your dog. The level of control needed for successful water blinds, as well as marks, will have risen dramatically. All that, and it’s fun, too! Enjoy the swim.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Dr. Jeckyll or Mr. Hyde? 

By Evan Graham


It’s another great day in the sun with your dog, and perhaps a friend (or group of friends), out training again. You have your first marks of the day set up and are ready to run. You have set up a holding blind because you’re not only a hunter, but a hunt tester/field trialer with your dog, and you’re smart enough to know not to send opposing messages to your dog about how he should behave in the field, whether training, trialing, or testing.

 

You take your dog out of his kennel and air him before running because that’s what you consistently do, and because it’s a good practice. You also walk him to the holding blind on a leash for the same reasons. When you’re ready to go up and run the marks you take your dog off lead and heel him to the line. You let him get a good look at the field before calling for the marks to be thrown, cuing him to “mark” (or whatever cue he is used to), and the fun begins.

 

As I view dog training, in all its variety of styles and theories, it consistently amounts to engineering our dog’s habits. We know they will form habits of some sort, whether we participate or not. By participating (via training) we guide the formation of the habits we hope our dogs will live and operate by. That, of course, requires the maintenance of those habits over our dog’s working career.

 

What’s a trainer to do?

 

What will you do if your dog becomes Jeckyll in one place, and Hyde in another? Mr. Hyde (the bad dog) may be appearing at the test (or in the duck blind) soon enough! Dr. Jeckyll (the good dog) is good in training because he expects the standards to be upheld there. If you are to make a change that will last and be reliable it will be necessary to change your dog’s expectations.

·        First, if your dog becomes too out of control at testing time, stop testing – completely. Re-habituate him to the standards of your training by making certain that he only works in a controlled environment for a while; several weeks or even months.

·        Second, you should take an honest look at how you train. Does your daily training resemble the testing environment, or are you sending your dog messages that set him up to recognize the difference? Do you use holding blinds? Do you spend a little time in the holding blind? How often do you use live flyers? Do you honor enough? Are you training around other people and dogs? Do you call numbers?

·        Third, do you over-use correction? The answer to this will require an honest look in the mirror. If you are using pressure too often it is not only poor training, it also sends the most distinct message of all that “today we are training. Tomorrow we may test, and you won’t be corrected for anything”. This is just one more very good reason not to let pressure replace thorough teaching, which is the hallmark of a good method and the appropriate application of it.

 

Working habits give dogs a uniform set of expectations. That’s why commands and cues need to be of a consistent character. Let’s use the above situation as an example.

 

·        The use of a holding blind in training sets a consistent standard because they will be using them at the hunt tests or field trials, also. When we fail to use them in training we send a signal that this environment is a different one with different standards. Your dog will quickly develop a different set of expectations in each situation. He will also arrive at the test or trial under-trained as to proper behavior in a holding blind.

·        Airing should be done consistently before putting your dog to work. That way your training is less likely to be interrupted by potty breaks during retrieves, and because it also sets up the expectation of going to work.

·        The use of a leash is something that you may or may not use at testing. But, if you do it there, you should also do it in training.

·        No matter where you are running your dog, he should expect to remain at heel while under that command, especially on the way to run. If this is done consistently in training, it should be his standard at testing or while hunting.

·        Taking an appropriate amount of time to look at the field, and using standard cues should also be done with consistency. Why?

 

Expectations. When you do things one way in one environment (training), and another way in another environment (testing), you send mixed messages, giving your dog reason to expect that all the stuff he has to do in training may not apply somewhere else. Dogs frequently become “trial-wise”, or “test-wise” through over exposure to testing in proportion to training. They get that way even faster if you telegraph your punches, so to speak, by doing things so differently in training than in testing that you help to paint a picture for them that more clearly distinguishes the two places from each other. The same is true when we get too lax while hunting our dogs.


Here a training group is conducting a multiple honor; multiple dog/handler teams online together while taking turns retrieving a shot flyer to promote steadiness in the presence of other dogs.
It’s commonplace for holding blinds to be used for contestants to wait their turn to run under judgment in field trials and in hunt tests.
If you want your dog to know how to behave in a holding blind it’s only fair and reasonable to train with them on a regular basis. Also note the use of a leash as this trainer arrives at the blind with his dog.

You can, and should, support many of the same standards during hunting as in training. The problem in testing and trialing is that you really have no legal way to support your standards of training, other than to just pick your dog up and deny him the opportunity to make further mistakes. They learn very fast that the two places are very different. New sounds, sights, and mechanics; really, a different atmosphere is sensed by most dogs quite readily. Just watch a seasoned gundog on the morning of a hunt when you start loading up, and see his excitement!

 

What standard does your dog expect?

 

At this point we must look into the way we approach daily training. There are many reasons to train by a proven method, but one of the best is that it presents the work in a uniform manner. If you train by a given method you will tend to do things consistently, including discipline. Your dog should know what to expect in terms of a standard of performance and effort.

 

One school of thought drives training in such a way that the dogs are allowed to get into trouble, get corrected, called back, and re-run. If this is done without excessive pressure, and with clear information regarding what the right thing to do is, it can work very effectively.

 

Another school of thought simply communicates the right thing as the dog progresses in each exercise by being handled. Instead of allowing a switch on multiple marks to be completed, a dog in this system would simply be handled to the correct mark as an explanation of what is correct to do. The only correction is for failure to make a legitimate effort to go, stop, or come as commanded during the course of the training exercise. Such a dog is being conditioned to a standard that he will come to expect as his job; his responsibility. He has been shown how to do it in a clear and fair way, the standard being consistently upheld during re-exposure.

 

While I prefer the latter, it is more important that either approach be applied fairly, consistently, and with pressure applied only in amounts needed to attain compliance with known commands or standards. Each trainer must read that situation as it arises.

 

What standard do you expect?

 

When you have a pup with lots of go, and love for birds, it’s easy to get over eager with him. The temptation to stretch him out too far too soon, or to “try doubles, just to see how he does”, or to get too far ahead of his abilities can break down his confidence, and start bad habits needlessly.

 


Are you sure she’s ready for doubles? Will she come to expect to fail or to succeed?

As your dog develops you must remember what level of work he is ready to be exposed to. If he has no handling skills yet, there are things you just shouldn’t be doing. If he isn’t steady there is no reason to be upset when he breaks. If he hasn’t had any shore breaking work you must expect him to cheat water, and so on.

 

Again, we see more reasons to follow a good sound method. In successfully proven methods you will see a logical progression of acquiring skills. These days the acquiring of fundamental skills is usually achieved through a program called “Basics”. Basics are like a tool kit. They are the equipment your dog will need to negotiate the transition to being fully trained, and to maintain the training he is given over his career.

 

As your dog moves through transition he will develop deepened habits, sharpened skills, and something that will propel him into the most rapid growth in his training life; expectations. He will start to put things together in more complicated fieldwork because he now understands more than just how to comply with a spoken command, or how to turn off pressure. He will soon see enough practical application of his skills in retrieving that he will come to expect fun and rewarding things to happen through living within the standards of training you have carefully and patiently given him.

 

He will learn, through this process, that he has a partner in retrieving. His trainer is working toward the same goal of getting him into plenty of birds. A well-presented method provides the learning trainer with reasonable expectations of his dogs, and gives that trainer’s dogs the best opportunities to become all that they are capable of. More enjoyment is just ahead for the two of you. Expect it!


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Four-way/Push-pull Drill

 

This is merely a simplified starter version of the Wagon Wheel Lining drill, and is part of the standard Basics program. It’s designed to initiate your pup to turning with you, and to acquaint him/her with the associated affects of what is called “push” and “pull”.

 

I believe in training dogs to associate specific responses with direct commands that are clear and distinct from other commands whenever possible. I have formed, therefore, the habit of teaching my dogs to respond to “heel” by backing up, and to “here” by coming toward me (a natural response following obedience training). When I have a dog at my left side, and turn right, I command “here”, which brings the dog to me – effectively turning him right. (see diagrams)


Picture a handler at the dog’s right (since the dog is heeled on the handler’s left). The dog’s rear end should remain on the ground, and the dog should pivot on it, bringing his upper torso toward the handler. That requires a distinct physical movement by the handler.

 

Pivot the dog as you move your body into a position that will result in the dog now being lined up for the next bumper in the drill. The effect of drawing the dog toward you, as each of you turns right, is called “pull”, and is an indirect influence compared to “push”.

 

Starting in the original position, with the dog still at the handler’s left, you would command “heel”, and move your body so that the dog can pivot from his front feet and shoulders – bringing his rear end toward you (backing up) into the heel position – resulting in a left turn.

*Note: Look closely at the dog’s position in each diagram. Two things should be obvious:

1.      The dog’s body, from the base of his tail to the tip of his nose, is lined up exactly online to the bumper.

2.      The dog has been positioned so that he is at heel with the intersecting lines even with his shoulders.

 

Those two things will happen only if the handler is willing to move his/her body in a manner that assures it. When the dog has been turned left in this scenario, the handler has remained in close physical proximity to the dog and can affect a “push” to attain the movement when the dog may resist it. This isn’t done by physically touching the dog, but rather occurs by simply being close enough to exert that effect when turning. Dogs have sense of personal space much like humans do, although they aren’t usually as fussy about it!

 

The drill proceeds with the handler rotating from bumper-to-bumper, having the dog retrieve each one he is positioned for, and alternating left and right turns. I suggest doing all left turns in one complete cycle, then all right turns – each cycle having the dog retrieve a bumper with each turn, and tossing it back out to its spot.

 

Soon you can alternate right and left turns to tune up that aspect of your dog’s obedience. As the dog becomes sharper at turning and lining, the drill can evolve into a full eight-bumper Wagon Wheel lining drill. I won’t go into that here.

 

A dog that is well trained to move with his handler is more responsive to direction, and is able to better execute the many tasks of a working retriever in the marsh or field. Good training!

 

___________________________________________________________________

Life is good. Life with a dog is better!


 
My friends, Will and Joanne Wilbanks with recently deceased "Lucy" (FC-AFC Trumarc's Too Hot to Handle). This wonderful little girl will be well remembered for many years to come.

  ___________________________________________________________________________________________


Rush Creek Press
PO Box 680
Liberty, MO 64069  
816-213-9397
  
 
rushcreekpress@aol.com

Copyright © 2009 Evan Graham LLC. All Rights Reserved.